Seastrand v. US Bank NA et al, No. 2:2017cv00214 - Document 92 (D. Utah 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER STRIKING 89 PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11/29/18. (jlw)

Download PDF
Seastrand v. US Bank NA et al Doc. 92 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH JOHN SEASTRAND, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGEMENT U.S. BANK, N.A., a nationally chartered bank; RALPH PACE, an individual acting in his official capacity as an officer and employee of U.S. BANK, N.A.; JACKLYN W. MILLER, GARY S. MILLER, JAY M. MINNICK, individuals; MILLER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation; MILLER MINNICK ASSOCIATES I, LLC and MILLWOOD COMPANIES, LC, Utah limited liability companies; and JOHN DOES 1-10 Case No. 2:17-CV-214 TS District Judge Ted Stewart Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Miller Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgement on October 16, 2018. Under DUCivR 7-1(3), Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition was due within 28 days after receiving service. However, Plaintiff requested and was granted an extension by the Court to file his opposition by 4:30 p.m. on November 20, 2018. Plaintiff failed to file by that deadline. On November 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed his Memorandum. Although the Memorandum is one week late, Plaintiff has not sought, nor has the Court granted, leave to file out of time. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B), the Court may extend a filing deadline upon a showing of “good cause” and “excusable neglect.” Plaintiff has presented the 1 Dockets.Justia.com Court with neither. Therefore, the Court will strike the Memorandum in Opposition and all attached exhibits. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Summary Judgment (Docket No. 89) is STRICKEN. DATED this 29th day of November 2018. BY THE COURT: Ted Stewart United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.