Neilson v. Herbert et al, No. 2:2016cv01239 - Document 40 (D. Utah 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER OF DISMISSAL: It is therefore ordered that, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, see DUCivilR 41-2, Plaintiff action is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 03/27/2018. (kpf) Modified to correct text on 3/27/2018 (kpf).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Neilson v. Herbert et al Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH LUCAS TROY NEILSON, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. CHIEF LOFGREEN et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-CV-1239-CW District Judge Clark Waddoups In an Order dated January 17, 2018, the Court required Plaintiff to--within fourteen days of receiving Defendants’ proposed order on their Motion to Dismiss--file objections. The proposed order was filed on January 31, 2018, which gave Plaintiff until February 14, 2018 to respond. On February 9, 2018, Plaintiff asked for a forty-day extension of time. The Court instead gave him until March 12, 2018. An additional two weeks have now gone by as well and still no word from Plaintiff. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2, Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. DATED this 27th day of March, 2018. BY THE COURT: JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
