Insixiengmy v. Wells Fargo et al, No. 2:2016cv01226 - Document 9 (D. Utah 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint: case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute - CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/22/17 (alt)

Download PDF
Insixiengmy v. Wells Fargo et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION JOHN INSIXIENGMY, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Case No. 2:16-cv-01226-DN-DBP WELLS FARGO, SALT LAKE COUNTY, IC SYSTEM, and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, District Judge David Nuffer Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant. The Report and Recommendation 1 issued by United States Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on September 6, 2017 recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint 2 be dismissed without prejudice based upon the Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case. 3 The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of its service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. No party filed a written objection to the Report and Recommendation as provided by court rules. Therefore, the analysis and conclusion of the Magistrate Judge are accepted and the Report and Recommendation 4 is adopted in its entirety. 1 Report and Recommendation, docket no. 8, filed September 6, 2017. 2 Complaint, docket no. 3, filed December 5, 2016. 3 Report and Recommendation at 1. 4 Report and Recommendation, docket no. 8, filed September 6, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 5 is ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed September 22, 2017. BY THE COURT ________________________________________ David Nuffer United States District Judge 5 Report and Recommendation, docket no. 8, filed September 6, 2017. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.