Rusk v. Utah ODAR Office et al, No. 2:2016cv00332 - Document 11 (D. Utah 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 10 Motion for Reconsideration of appointment of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/31/16. (jmr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rusk v. Utah ODAR Office et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ZACHARY R. E. RUSK, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION Case No. 2:16-cv-00332-CW-PMW v. District Judge Clark Waddoups UTAH ODAR OFFICE et al., Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner Defendants. Before the court is Plaintiff Zachary R. E. Rusk’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for reconsideration of an order declining to appoint counsel.1 Plaintiff fails to state substantive factual or legal grounds for reconsideration. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Plaintiff is reminded again that he is required to know and comply with the rules and procedures of the court. See DUCivR 83-1.1(f). Moreover, the court will not advocate on behalf of, or construct legal theories for, a pro se litigant. See generally Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, 318 F.3d 1183, 1187 (10th Cir. 2003); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991); Dunn v. White, 880 F.2d 1188, 1197 (10th Cir. 1989). DATED this 31st day of May, 2016. BY THE COURT: PAUL M. WARNER United States Magistrate Judge 1 Docket no. 10. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
