Smith v. Potter et al, No. 2:2016cv00195 - Document 29 (D. Utah 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case,see DUCivR 41-2, Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 11/16/2017. (eat)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smith v. Potter et al Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH BRADLEY JOE SMITH, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER Plaintiff, v. SANDY HUTHMAN et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-CV-195-DAK District Judge Dale A. Kimball In an Order dated August 4, 2017, the Court required Plaintiff to--within ten days--file a notice of intention to oppose or not oppose Defendant Markeson’s Motion to Dismiss. If he did not, the Court warned that the motion would be granted. More than three months later, Plaintiff has not responded. Indeed, the Order was returned to sender, marked, “Inmate was released.” The Court last heard from Plaintiff on January 18, 2017, when he filed his initial partial filing fee. He has not updated his address with the Court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2, Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. DATED this 16th day of November, 2017. BY THE COURT: JUDGE DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
