Evans v. Winder et al, No. 2:2015cv00249 - Document 13 (D. Utah 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), follow the Courts Order, and to prosecute his case, see DUCivR 41-2. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 7/25/2017. (las)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Evans v. Winder et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH DOUGLAS D. EVANS, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. Case No. 2:15-CV-249-TS JIM WINDER et al., Defendants. District Judge Ted Stewart Plaintiff, Douglas D. Evans, filed this pro se civil-rights suit, see 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2017). Reviewing the Complaint under § 1915(e), in an Order dated May 4, 2017, the Court determined it was deficient. The Court gave Plaintiff directions for curing the deficiencies, sent him a "Pro Se Litigant Guide," with a blank-form civil rights complaint, and ordered him to cure the deficiencies within thirty days. Plaintiff has not since amended the Complaint. Indeed, the Court’s order was returned to sender, marked, “PRISONER RELEASED.” The Court last heard from Plaintiff on August 6, 2015, when he filed his consent-to-collection form. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), follow the Court’s Order, and to prosecute his case, see DUCivR 41-2. This case is CLOSED. DATED this 25th day of July, 2017. BY THE COURT: JUDGE TED STEWART United States District Court 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
