Essociate v. NDemand Affiliates et al, No. 2:2013mc01050 - Document 10 (D. Utah 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL 9 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 2 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/30/2014. (blh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Essociate v. NDemand Affiliates et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH ESSOCIATE, INC., a Delaware corporation, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. LINKTRUST SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 2:13-MC-1050 TS Defendant. District Judge Ted Stewart On November 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel. 1 The Motion was subsequently referred to a Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). 2 The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 12, 2014. 3 The matter is before the Court for consideration of that Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff s Motion be granted in part and denied in part, as detailed in the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b), a party has 14 days from the receipt of the Report and Recommendation to file an objection. Neither party has done so. The Court has considered the Motion and associated memoranda in the file, and the Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge s August 12, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 9) is ADOPTED IN FULL. It is further 1 Docket No. 2. 2 Docket No. 3. 3 Docket No. 9. 1 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that Plaintiff s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiff s Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT, as detailed in the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case forthwith. DATED this 30th day of September, 2014. BY THE COURT: Ted Stewart United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
