Roundy et al v. Zions Bancorporation et al, No. 2:2013cv01053 - Document 26 (D. Utah 2014)
Court Description: ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying 17 Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 18 Motion to Consider 7 motion as a summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 2/24/14 (alt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION CLIVE T. ROUNDY and KRISTINE M. ROUNDY, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND vs. MEMORANDUM DECISION ZIONS BANCORPORATION, et al., Case No. 2:13-CV-1053-TC Defendants. The Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the claims of pro se Plaintiffs Clive and Kristine Roundy. (See Docket No. 7.) The Defendants have also filed a motion seeking sanctions against the Plaintiffs. (See Docket No. 17.) The court has carefully reviewed the briefs and supporting material, as well as the relevant legal authority supporting the motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the Defendants Motion and Memorandum To Dismiss With Prejudice (Docket No. 7) and the Defendants Reply (Docket No. 16), the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The court has also reviewed the Defendants Motion and Memorandum for Sanctions against the Plaintiffs (Docket No. 17). The court declines to impose sanctions, so the motion is DENIED. But if either Plaintiff files anything further in the District of Utah related to the matters in this case, the court will reconsider its decision on sanctions. The Plaintiff s motion to consider the Defendants motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 18) is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: TENA CAMPBELL U.S. District Court Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
