Rohwedder v. Unified Police Department et al, No. 2:2013cv00750 - Document 27 (D. Utah 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ordered that: If UPD is unable to accept service of process for the defendant identified above, UPD shall disclose to the USMS any information in its records that may help in identifying, locating and completing service of process upon the named defendant. See order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/14/2015. (kpf)

Download PDF
Rohwedder v. Unified Police Department et al Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH BILLY L. ROHWEDDER, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER v. DETECTIVE CHRISTIE BROWN et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:13-CV-750 CW District Judge Clark Waddoups The Court has directed the United States Marshals Service to serve process in this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). To do so, by statute, the United States Marshal "shall command all necessary assistance to execute its duties." See 28 U.S.C.S. § 556(c) (2015). The Complaint identifies the following Unified Police Department (UPD) employee as a defendant: Detective Christie Brown. Service of process on current government employees may be effected via authorized agent. If the named defendant is no longer employed by UPD or UPD is not authorized to accept service for this individual, more information must be obtained from UPD to complete service. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: If UPD is unable to accept service of process for the defendant identified above, UPD shall disclose to the United States Marshals Service any information in its records that may help in identifying, locating and completing service of process upon the named defendant. Such information shall include, but is not limited to, the defendant’s full name and any known aliases, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, all previous addresses, and last known addresses on file. The U.S. Dockets.Justia.com Marshal shall take all necessary measures to safeguard any personal information provided by UPD to ensure that it is not disclosed to anyone other than the U.S. Marshals Service or Court officers. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 14th day of October, 2015. BY THE COURT: JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS United States District Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.