Stoedter v. Salt Lake County et al, No. 2:2012cv00255 - Document 122 (D. Utah 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 100 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 103 Motion for Summary Judgment.The parties must file an amended proposed pretrial order within 20 days from the date of this order, confining the issues of fact and law to the brief period noted in the body of this opinion as being genuinely in dispute. Signed by Judge Bruce S. Jenkins on 8/6/14. (ss)

Download PDF
CONCLUSION With material facts in dispute preventing the court from determining whether Plaintiff was unlawfully seized and whether Defendants are protected by qualified immunity, and after finding that Plaintiff has not provided sufficient evidence regarding UPD liability, the court DENIES Plaintiff's summary judgment motion. Defendants' summary judgment motion regarding qualified immunity and UPD liability is likewise DENIED. In light of this opinion, the parties must file an amended proposed pretrial order within 20 days from the date of this order, confining the issues of fact and law to the briefperiod noted in the body of this opinion as being genuinely in dispute. ~ DATED this L- day of August, 2014. ~ ------ 29

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.