Peck v. Midland Funding et al, No. 2:2011cv00611 - Document 32 (D. Utah 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 17 Motion to Strike 16 Response (NOT to motion). Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 03/27/2012. (tls)
Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION JACKIE PECK Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. MIDLAND FUNDING, LCC and JOHNSON MARK, LLC Case No. 2:11-CV-611 TS Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiff s Response to Answer to Amended Complaint. 1 While the Court may order a reply to an answer under rule 7(a)(7), 2 it has not done so in this case. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff s filings are not permitted pleadings. 3 Plaintiff is free to re-file any of the exhibits filed with her Response as exhibits to another memorandum or motion. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby 1 Docket No. 17. 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7). 3 Although Defendants have only requested that the Response at Docket No. 16 be stricken, the Court will strike the Response at Docket No. 10 on the same grounds. 1 ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiff s Response to Answer to Amended Complaint (Docket No. 17) is GRANTED. DATED March 27, 2012. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2