Hiner et al v. Selene Finance et al, No. 2:2011cv00261 - Document 12 (D. Utah 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims are Dismissed With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/26/2011. (las)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION BART HINER and NIKKI HINER, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS vs. SELENE FINANCE, LP; AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.; and OPTION ONE MORTGAGE; Case No. 2:11-CV-261 TS Defendants. The Court has before it Defendants Selene Finance, LP and American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. s (collectively, Defendants ) Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).1 Defendants contend that each of the causes of action alleged in the Complaint have been repeatedly rejected by this Court and rely upon meritless misinterpretations of case law and Utah statutes. The Court agrees. In reviewing Plaintiffs arguments, the Court finds no meaningful distinction between this cause of action and the numerous actions the Court 1 Docket Nos. 4-3 & 5. Defendant Option One Mortgage was removed from this action per Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. See Docket No 4-7. 1 has previously dismissed. As persuasively demonstrated by Defendants in their memoranda, the present claims have been considered, and rejected, by this Court. The Court finds no reason to depart from its prior holdings that these claims fail as a matter of law. Because Plaintiffs have failed to plead a cause of action upon which relief may be granted, it is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 4-3 & 5) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case forthwith. DATED May 26, 2011. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.