Sindar v. Nebeker, No. 2:2009cv00307 - Document 10 (D. Utah 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION - denying 4 Motion for Severance. Petitioner's petition for Writ of Mandamus is also Denied. Because this court lacks jurisdiction in this matter. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case in its entirety. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 6/18/09. (las)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION FRANK LOUIS SINDAR, Petitioner, MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER vs. Case No. 2:09CV307DAK EVAN A. NEBEKER, Respondent. This matter is before the court on Pro-Se Petitioner Frank Louis Sindar s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the Utah Supreme Court to proceed with a malfeasance complaint entitled Sindar v. Nebeker. Petitioner does not assert a specific jurisdictional basis for bringing his Petition for Mandamus in this court. The court must presume that this writ is brought pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651(a). The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, has held that a federal district court does not have jurisdiction to direct a state court to perform its duty. White v. Ward, 145 F.3d 1139, 1140 (10th Cir. 1998). Moreover, review of a final state court judgment may be had only in the United States Supreme Court. See Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459 (2006); District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 46 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to the Utah Supreme Court and cannot review its actions. Accordingly, Petitioner s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. Because this court lacks jurisdiction in this matter, Petitioner s Motion for Severance of Defendants is also DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case in its entirety. DATED this 18th day of June, 2009. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
