Landress et al v. Hiko Bell Mining and Oil et al, No. 2:2006cv00734 - Document 107 (D. Utah 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION: the 5/27/2009 90 Summary Judgment is amended to delete the following provision: Plaintiffs are further directed to submit to the Court, prior to distribution, the proposed proxy solicitation statements and notice for the proposed shareholder meeting and the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to approve, amend and otherwise allow such proxy statement as it may deem appropriate. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/10/09. (ce)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ROGER LANDRESS; TEXAS SABAL, INC., a Nevada corp.; and WILLIAM POWELL, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT vs. HIKO BELL MINING & OIL CO., and ROBERT COVINGTON, et al., Case No. 2:06-CV-734 TS Defendants. On May 27, 2009, Summary Judgment was entered in this case. Among other things, it provided: For an Order approving the holding of a special shareholder meeting to elect new directors to the Company . . . . A copy of the approved proxy ballot for such meeting is attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit A. 1 Plaintiffs are further directed to submit to the Court, prior to distribution, the proposed proxy solicitation statements and notice for the proposed shareholder meeting and the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to approve, 1 Docket No. 90, ¶ 4 at 3. 1 amend and otherwise allow such proxy statement as it may deem appropriate.2 Upon consideration, the Court finds it improvident to have retained jurisdiction over the matter of approving proxy statements and ballots. Judgment having been entered, and the form of the proxy ballots having been approved pursuant to the Summary Judgment, it is unnecessary to have further court involvement in the matter of proxy statements and ballots. It is therefore ORDERED that the May 27, 2009, Summary Judgment is AMENDED to delete the following provision: Plaintiffs are further directed to submit to the Court, prior to distribution, the proposed proxy solicitation statements and notice for the proposed shareholder meeting and the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to approve, amend and otherwise allow such proxy statement as it may deem appropriate.3 DATED September 10, 2009. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2 Id. ¶ 4 at 3. 3 Id. ¶ 4 at 3. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
