-BCW Christensen v. Park City Municipal Corporation et al, No. 2:2006cv00202 - Document 162 (D. Utah 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 123 Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant's Attempts to Contradict Facts that Have Been Established as Undisputed. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 2/28/2011. (las)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-BCW Christensen v. Park City Municipal Corporation et al Doc. 162 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION SHAUN L. CHRISTENSEN, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANT FROM INTRODUCING EVIDENCE ON FACTS THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AS UNDISPUTED vs. PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORP., Case No. 2:06-CV-202 TS Defendant. Plaintiff argues that by quoting facts from his Amended Complaint in its Motion for Summary Judgment and not specifying that it had done so for the purposes of the Motion only, Defendant has judicially admitted those facts. Plaintiff argues the Court should deem them established under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(g). Accordingly, he argues that Defendant should now be precluded from introducing evidence on those facts. Defendant argues that the Pretrial Order controls regarding the disputed issues of fact for trial. 1 Dockets.Justia.com The Court agrees with Defendant. The issues of fact are those set forth in the Pretrial Order. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff s Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant s Attempts to Contradict Facts that Have Been Established as Undisputed (Docket No. 123) is DENIED. DATED February 28, 2011. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
