Naves v. Sparks et al, No. 1:2022cv00046 - Document 21 (D. Utah 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION and Dismissal Order: this action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/5/23 (alt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Naves v. Sparks et al Doc. 21 Case 1:22-cv-00046-JNP Document 21 Filed 09/05/23 PageID.107 Page 1 of 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH RANDALL THOMAS NAVES, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER Case No. 1:22-CV-46 JNP KELLY SPARKS et al., District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendants. On July 25, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff within thirty days to show cause why the Complaint, (ECF No. 7), should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, (ECF No. 20). The Court set forth a detailed analysis explaining the claims' invalidity. (Id.) Plaintiff has not responded and has not been heard from directly in this case since March 30, 2023. (ECF No. 18.) The analysis in the Order to Show Cause therefore stands unchallenged. (ECF No. 20.) Based on that analysis, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C.S. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2023). DATED this 5th day of September, 2023. BY THE COURT: JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
