Carl v. State of Utah et al, No. 1:2018cv00097 - Document 14 (D. Utah 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION and DISMISSAL ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), follow the Courts Order, and to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/13/2019. (mas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carl v. State of Utah et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH SHANE R. CARL, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. STATE OF UTAH et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:18-CV-97-DB District Judge Dee Benson Reviewing this prisoner civil-rights complaint under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915A (2019), in an Order dated October 12, 2018, the Court deemed it deficient. (Doc. No. 12.) The Court gave directions for curing deficiencies, sent Plaintiff a "Pro Se Litigant Guide" (with a civil-rights complaint form), and ordered deficiencies be cured within thirty days. On November 2, 2018, Plaintiff instead filed a nonresponsive document, titled, “Summary of Facts for Case.” (Doc. No. 13.) More than six months have passed, but the Court has not again heard from Plaintiff. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), follow the Court’s Order, and to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED. DATED this 13th day of May, 2019. BY THE COURT: JUDGE DEE BENSON United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
