Fowers v. Crowther, No. 1:2016cv00177 - Document 12 (D. Utah 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER: In an Order dated August 8, 2017, the Court required Plaintiff to within 120 days file his reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. That gave Plaintiff until December 4, 2017 to file his repl y. On August 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. The Court re-sent its August 8th order to the new address. Still Plaintiff has not responded. It is therefore ordered that, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, Plaintiffs action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 01/17/2018. (kpf)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Fowers v. Crowther Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH WILLIAM ELI FOWERS, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. SCOTT CROWTHER, Defendant. Case No. 1:16-CV-177-DN District Judge David Nuffer In an Order dated August 8, 2017, (Docket Entry # 9), the Court required Plaintiff to-within 120 days--“file his reply to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” (Docket Entry # 6). That gave Plaintiff until December 4, 2017 to file his reply. On August 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. The Court re-sent its August 8th order to the new address. Still, Plaintiff has not responded. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, see DUCivR 41-2, Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. DATED this 17th day of January, 2018. BY THE COURT: CHIEF JUDGE DAVID NUFFER United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
