Cox v. Cache County et al, No. 1:2008cv00124 - Document 170 (D. Utah 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 168 Motion to Amend/Correct. Defendants must file their summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs third and fourth claims for relief by April 25, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/4/14. (jmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION DARREN E. COX, COX HONEY OF UTAH, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION Case No. 1:08-cv-00124-CW-DBP v. District Judge Clark Waddoups CACHE COUNTY, a Utah municipal corporation, et al., Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendants. This matter was referred to the Court under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(A). (Docket No. 168.) Under the current scheduling order, the parties dispositive motion deadline expired on June 7, 2013. (Dkt. No. 124.) Defendants now move to amend the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 168.) They want to extend the dispositive motion deadline so that they may file a summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs third and fourth claims for relief. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiffs have not responded to Defendants motion, and the time to do so has expired. See DUCivR 7-1(b)(3)(B). Given Plaintiffs failure to respond, the Court GRANTS Defendants motion. (Dkt. No. 168.) See DUCivR 7-1(d) ( Failure to respond timely to a motion may result in the court s granting the motion without further notice. ). Page 1 of 2 Defendants must file their summary judgment motion regarding Plaintiffs third and fourth claims for relief by April 25, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 4th day of April, 2014. By the Court: Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.