Phillip M. Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. Lenovo International et al, No. 1:2005cv00064 - Document 1221 (D. Utah 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 1211 Motion to Continue; Daubert Motions due by 07/19/2010, Motions in Limine due by 8/2/2010 by 5:00 p.m., Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/23/2010 03:00 PM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart., Jury Trial reset for 9/8/2010 08:30 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 02/23/2010. (asp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION PHILLIP M. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SECOND MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER vs. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Case No. 1:05-CV-64 TS Defendants. Defendants Sony Electronics, Winbond, ASUSTek, and MSI move to continue the four-week jury trial currently set to begin April 6, 2010. Plaintiff opposes continuing the trial. In the alternative, Plaintiff requests that it be rescheduled as soon as possible. Being fully advised, the Court will continue the jury trial and reschedule trial to begin on September 8, 2010. A new trial order will be issued modifying the dates. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Continue Trial (Docket No. 1211) is GRANTED and the Scheduling Order is modified as set forth below. 1 Event Current Modified Date Date Plaintiff s Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures 2/8/10 6/28/10 Defendant s Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures 2/22/10 7/12/10 Daubert Motions Deadline 2/26/10 7/19/10 Special Attorney Conference 3/8/10 8/2/10 Motion in Limine Deadline 3/15/10 8/2/10, by 5:00 p.m. Responses to Motions in Limine 3/22/10 8/9/10, by 5:00 p.m. Final Pretrial Conference 3/23/10 8/23/10, at 3:00 p.m. Trial Briefs 3/23/10 8/30/10 Jury Trial 4/6/10 9/8/10 Any Daubert motion shall be subject to the page limitations and other requirements of DUCivR 7-1. Motions in Limine will be governed by the Court s Trial Order. DATED February 23, 2010. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
