Hajicek v. Werner Enterprises Inc et al, No. 6:2017cv00337 - Document 47 (W.D. Tex. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER transferring case to the Western District of Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 11/30/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 12/1/2017.]

Download PDF
Hajicek v. Werner Enterprises Inc et al Doc. 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DEBRA HAJICEK as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald Ruiz, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-826-JD-MGG OPINION AND ORDER On October 19, 2017, this Court raised jurisdictional and venue issues through its sua sponte Opinion and Order. [DE 45]. In compliance with the Order, Plaintiff timely filed her Brief on Jurisdiction and Venue on November 3, 2017. [DE 46]. In her brief, Plaintiff provided a facially adequate allegation of the citizenship of the decedent Ronald Ruiz addressing the Court’s question regarding subject matter jurisdiction. [Id. at 1]. Based on the assumption that the United States District Court retains jurisdiction in this case, Plaintiff further conceded that venue is proper in the Western District of Texas rather than in this District. [Id. at 2]. Defendant Stanley Polk, proceeding pro se, filed nothing in response to Plaintiff’s Brief leading the Court to assume that Polk does not object to Plaintiff’s jurisdictional and venue conclusions. The Court agrees with Plaintiff that venue is not proper here in the Northern District of Indiana. According to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint filed on February 9, 2017, the judicial district in which a “substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to [Plaintiff’s] claim occurred” is the Western District of Texas. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). Moreover, Polk has neither objected to Plaintiff’s assessment that venue is proper in Texas under Section 1391 nor explicitly Dockets.Justia.com consented to venue in this district to justify maintaining the case here. See De La Fuente v. I.C.C., 451 F. Supp. 867, 870 (N.D. Ill. 1978). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be transferred to the Western District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) because venue is proper in that district and this case could have been brought there originally. SO ORDERED. Dated this 30th day of November 2017. s/Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. United States Magistrate Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.