Cano v. Harlandale Independent School District, No. 5:2019cv01296 - Document 66 (W.D. Tex. 2022)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr)

Download PDF
Cano v. Harlandale Independent School District Doc. 66 Case 5:19-cv-01296-ESC Document 66 Filed 01/24/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION DESTINY CANO, § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, vs. HARLANDALE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. SA-19-CV-01296-ESC FINAL JUDGMENT Before the Court is the above-styled cause of action. On December 16, 2020, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff’s claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title IX. On January 21, 2022, the Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, affirming the administrative decision that Plaintiff’s claim under the Individuals with Disabilities Act is time-barred and that Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies as to her claims under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Court has disposed of all claims asserted by Plaintiff in this case and hereby renders a final judgment affirming the administrative decision and ordering that Plaintiff take nothing by her other causes of action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the decision of the Texas Education Agency that Plaintiff Destiny Cano’s administrative claim under the Individuals with Disabilities Act is time-barred is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Destiny Cano TAKE NOTHING against Defendant Harlandale Independent School District as to her other claims in this lawsuit and that all costs of suit are taxed against the party bearing the same. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:19-cv-01296-ESC Document 66 Filed 01/24/22 Page 2 of 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 24th day of January, 2022. ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.