Callier v. National United Group, LLC et al, No. 3:2021cv00071 - Document 65 (W.D. Tex. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT NATIONAL UNITED GROUP, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART re 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by National United Group, LLC. Signed by Judge David Briones. (lc3)

Download PDF
Callier v. National United Group, LLC et al Doc. 65 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DMSION BRANDON CALLIER, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL UNITED GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § EP-21-CV-71-DB MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT NATIONAL UNITED GROUP, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS On this day, the Court considered Defendant National United Group, LLC's ("National United") "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint" ("Motion"), filed in the above-captioned case on July 14, 2021. ECF No. 43. Therein, National United asks the Court to dismiss Plaintiff Brandon Callier's ("Mr. Callier") First Amended Complaint ("Amended Complaint"), filed on June 24, 2021. ECF No. 33. Mr. Callier alleges that National United, along with other entities and individuals, violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") and Texas consumer-protection statutes by making repeated phone calls to Mr. Callier's cellular phone using a robocalling system. See Amend. Compl. 1-3, 8-15, ECF No. 33. Mr. Callier issued his Response, ECF No. 44, to National United's Motion on July 19, 2021, and National United issued its Reply, ECF No. 48, on July 27, 2021. The Court finds that Mr. Callier's allegations are sufficient to raise an inference that National United may be responsible for violations of the TCPA and the Texas Business and Commerce Code. However, one of Mr. Callier's claims fails. Accordingly, the Court will deny the Motion in part and grant the Motion in part. Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 2 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 3 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 4 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 5 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 6 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 7 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 8 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 9 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 10 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 11 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 12 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 13 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 14 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 15 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 16 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 17 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 18 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 19 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 20 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 21 of 22 Case 3:21-cv-00071-DB Document 65 Filed 11/17/21 Page 22 of 22

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.