Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo v. City Of El Paso et al, No. 3:2017cv00162 - Document 96 (W.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AMENDING 94 Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: All claims asserted by Plaintiff Ysleta Del SurPueblo against Defendant City of El Paso in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo v. City Of El Paso et al Doc. 96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, a federally § recognizedsovereign Indian tribe, § § Plaintiff V. CITY OF EL PASO, Defendant. § § EP-17-CV-00162-DCG § § § § ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On this day, the Court issued a "Memorandum Opinion and Order" (ECF No. 94). The Court observes that there is a typographical error in this Order. Specifically, on page 20, the Order states that "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo against Defendant City of El Paso in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE", whereas the Court intended the order to state: "DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE" as reflected in the "Final Judgment" (ECF No. 95). Accordingly, the "Memorandum Opinion and Order" (ECF No. 94) is REVISED and AMENDED as follows: On page 20, "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo against Defendant City of El Paso in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE." So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of January 2020. TD C. GUADERHRAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
