KLA-Tencor Corporation v. Xitronix Corporation, No. 1:2008cv00723 - Document 211 (W.D. Tex. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (klw, )

Download PDF
KLA-Tencor Corporation v. Xitronix Corporation Doc. 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, Individually and d/b/a KLA-Tencor, Inc., Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. A-08-CA-723-SS XITRONIX CORPORATION, Defendant. __________________________________________ FINAL JUDGMENT BE IT REMEMBERED on the 1st day of November 2010 the Court called the abovecaptioned case, and the plaintiff KLA-Tencor Corporation appeared with counsel of record, and the defendant Xitronix Corporation appeared with its counsel of record, and a jury composed of seven legally and duly qualified jurors having been selected, this case proceeded to trial until November 5, 2010, when the the jury returned with its unanimous verdict as follows: Question 1a. Answer: Yes Question 1b. Answer: Yes for Claim 7; No for Claim 9 Question 2. Answer: Yes for Claim 7 based on the ‘611 patent and the ThermaProbe device; No for Claims 9, 11, and 12. Question 3. Answer: Yes for Claims 7, 9, 11, and 12. The Court received the verdict and filed it with the Clerk. Thus, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 7,362,441 is invalid as anticipated, in accordance with the jury’s verdict. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS FURTHER ORDERED , ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Claims 7, 9, 11, and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,362,441 are invalid as obvious, in accordance with the jury’s verdict. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED , ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Claims 7, 9, 11, and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,362,441 are invalid due to indefiniteness. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED , ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all costs of suit shall be paid by KLA Tencor Corporation. SIGNED this the 31st day of January 2011. ____________________________________ SAM SPARKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 723 judgment.tb.wpd -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.