Association Insurance Company v. Equinox Design, Inc. et al, No. 4:2022cv00422 - Document 30 (S.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified.(agould, 3)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Association Insurance Company v. Equinox Design, Inc. et al Doc. 30 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ASSOCIATION INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff. V. EQUINOX DESIGN, INC., et al., Defendants. November 10, 2022 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-cv-00422 § § § § OPINION AND ORDER Pending before me is Plaintiff Association Insurance Co.’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants Equinox Design, Inc. and Rony-Claude Le Brun’s 1st Amended Counterclaim (“Motion to Dismiss”). See Dkt. 26. Having reviewed the counterclaim and the Motion to Dismiss, I DENY the motion without prejudice. By way of background, Association Insurance Co. (“Association”) filed a declaratory judgment action against Equinox Design, Inc. and Rony-Claude Le Brun (collectively, “Defendants”), seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend Defendants under several general liability insurance policies for a remaining fraud claim in a state court lawsuit.1 Defendants filed a counterclaim— also a declaratory judgment action—seeking a declaration that in the event the insurance policies at issue do not obligate Association to defend Defendants against the fraud claim, Association should be estopped from denying coverage because Association’s actions in the defense of the state court lawsuit have prejudiced Defendants. In its Motion to Dismiss, Association argues that Defendants’ counterclaim should be dismissed because it improperly mirrors Association’s claim. Association also argues that the counterclaim should be dismissed because The underlying lawsuit is pending in the 333rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas and concerns Equinox Design, Inc.’s allegedly faulty repairs to a home damaged by Hurricane Ike. See Dkt. 1 at 4. 1 Dockets.Justia.com “estoppel is only a defensive assertion and not a cause of action under Texas law.” Dkt. 26 at 5. In response, Defendants argue that the counterclaim should be permitted to proceed because the counterclaim is not a mirror image of Association’s claims, and estoppel is a distinct cause of action. At this preliminary juncture, I think the best approach is to deny the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and allow the parties to proceed through the discovery process. I will then, at the summary judgment stage, determine the viability of the counterclaim based on a full record. For these reasons, Association’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. SIGNED this 10th day of November 2022. ______________________________ ANDREW M. EDISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
