Reed v. Marshall et al, No. 4:2021cv03942 - Document 57 (S.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, the Lanham Act claims that Plaintiff has asserted are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the state law claims and counterclaims that have been asserted are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs shall be taxed against the Plaintiff...*** Case terminated on 10/20/23. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reed v. Marshall et al Doc. 57 United States District Court Southern District of Texas IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DI REED, ENTERED October 20, 2023 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-21-3942 Plaintiff, v. JOI MARSHALL, TONYA HARRIS P/K/A TONYA KELLY, and MYRACLE HOLLOWAY, Defendants. JOI MARSHALL and TONYA HARRIS, Counterclaimants, v. DI REED, Counterclaim-Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, the Lanham Act claims that Plaintiff has asserted are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the state law claims and counterclaims that have been asserted are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs shall be taxed against the Plaintiff. This is a FINAL JUDGMENT. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 20th day of October, 2023. SIM LAKE SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
