Ruano v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al, No. 4:2021cv01180 - Document 48 (S.D. Tex. 2023)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE to 334th District Court of Harris County. Case terminated on 8/10/2023(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4)

Download PDF
Ruano v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al Doc. 48 Case 4:21-cv-01180 Document 48 Filed on 08/10/23 in TXSD Page 1 of 3 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ERICK RUANO, Plaintiff, VS. JALEN JORDAN, AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § August 11, 2023 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:21-CV-01180 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER For the reasons stated below, and because the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction over this case, this matter is REMANDED to the 334th District Court of Harris County. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On August 7, 2019, Ruano’s vehicle was hit by a vehicle driven by Jalen Jordan, an employee of Pack & Ride, LLC. (Dkt 37-2). Ruano, who was under the impression that Jordan was driving an Amazon delivery truck, filed a state-court suit against Amazon.com Services, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. (“the Amazon Defendants”) for negligence, respondeat superior, negligent entrustment of a motor vehicle, negligent hiring, and gross negligence. (Dkt. 1-6). The Amazon Defendants removed the case to this Court. (Dkt. 1). The Court granted leave for Ruano to file an Amended Complaint (Dkt. 22), wherein Ruano added Jordan as a Defendant (Dkt. 23). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:21-cv-01180 Document 48 Filed on 08/10/23 in TXSD Page 2 of 3 LEGAL STANDARD “If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). “[F]ederal courts must address jurisdictional questions whenever they are raised and must consider jurisdiction sua sponte if not raised by the parties.” Howery v. Allstate Ins. Co., 243 F.3d 912, 919 (5th Cir.2001). Though a court may not sua sponte remand a case for procedural defects, § 1447(c) makes clear that a court must remand a case if it determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Coleman v. Alcolac, Inc., 888 F.Supp. 1388, 1394 (S.D. Tex. 1995). ANALYSIS After this case was removed from state court, Ruano sought and obtained leave to add Jalen Jordan, the driver of the van involved in the accident, as a defendant. (Dkt. 22). Ruano’s Amended Complaint states that Jordan, like Ruano, resides in Harris County, Texas. (Dkt. 23 at 2). Thus, the inclusion of Jordan has destroyed complete diversity between the parties. Federal courts have “original jurisdiction” over civil actions where the parties are diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). However, such diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity—that is, the citizenship of each plaintiff must be diverse from the citizenship of each defendant. See, e.g., Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61 (1996). Because the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction, this matter is remanded to state court. 2 Case 4:21-cv-01180 Document 48 Filed on 08/10/23 in TXSD Page 3 of 3 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the 334th District Court of Harris County. All other motions are DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED at Houston, Texas on August 10, 2023. _______________________________ GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.