Gray v. Berryhill, No. 4:2019cv01177 - Document 23 (S.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT - It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in this Courts separate 22 Memorandum and Order that Plaintiffs 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, Defendants 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and thedecision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED....***Case terminated on 7/16/20. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gray v. Berryhill Doc. 23 Case 4:19-cv-01177 Document 23 Filed on 07/16/20 in TXSD Page 1 of 1 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION QUELONDA LURAYE GRAY, Plaintiff, V. ANDREW SAUL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § July 16, 2020 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1177 FINAL JUDGMENT It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in this Court’s separate Memorandum and Order that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 17) is DENIED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 19) is GRANTED, and the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. This is a FINAL JUDGMENT. The Clerk will enter this Order and send copies to all parties of record. Signed at Houston, Texas, this 16th day of July , 2020. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
