Lusk v. Warner et al, No. 4:2018cv00831 - Document 6 (S.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Claims are dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)

Download PDF
Lusk v. Warner et al Doc. 6 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STRI COU RT CT FOR TH E SOU THERN D I STRI O F TEX A S CT HOU STON D I SI VI ON May 08, 2018 David J. Bradley, Clerk CHA RLES EDW A RD LU SK, Pl ntj ai f i Ci lA cton N o.1 18- 1 vi i 4- 083 ALI A SCOTT,e al, CI t . Dee dans f n t. M EM O RA ND UM O PI O N AN D O RD ER NI Pl ntf Cha l Edw ar Lus TDCJ CI #01964427, s a ei at oce ngrrp ai if res d k, - D a t t nm epr edi se, fl t s s ton 1 ied hi ec i 983 l s t aga ns t o prs e pl yees. H e s ks m one a y aw ui i tw i on m o ee tr c ompens i f t def nda s confs ton ofhi per onalpr t a r t i i aton or he e nt ' i ca i s s opery nd e alaton. H a ng s r ene hecompl nt s vi c e dt ai pur uantt s cton 1 5A ,heCOUM D I I o e i 91 t SM SSEStAS Ii l ui f t r onst f l . aws t or he eas hat olow 1. Backgr ound and Cl m s ai Pl ntf r porst ,on N ove ber7,201 hi cel w as s r hed a hi per ona ai if e t hat m 7, s l ea c nd s s l pr t wasconfs t H es a est t de e nt i or ed hi t t pr rt w as opery i ca ed. t t hat he f nda s nf m m hat he ope y c icat d beca e i w asi ope l sor a ow ner hi w a notesabls onfs e us t mpr ry t ed nd s p s t i hed. Pl ntf ai i f di agr wih t r onsgi n by def nda sf t confs tons.H i s e 1 a s e 2 s ees t he eas ve e nt or he i ca i s t p nd t p grevanc wer de ed.He f t rcom pl nst aw ee afe he fl hi gr e nces hi i es e ni urhe ai hat k tr ied s i va , s Dockets.Justia.com j ba sg n a t prs nlundywa c n di rtlai frt g iva e .Hea srs o sinme t the io a r s ha ge n eaiton o he re nc s set noc ansa u a yne j ba sgn nt ma ha erc i d. omplit bo t n w o si me he y v e eve Pl ntf s kst r ur ofhi pr ry a m one ar com pe aton. ai if ee he et n s ope t nd t y ns i l . Anal i I ys s l i w el s te t a k ut i i e i de i ton ofpr ry'doesnot t s l etl d hat n k una horzed, nt ntonal prva i ope t ' c tt e aci lrght vi a i i t r e ssa m ea ngf a ade t pos- prva i ons iut vi i s ol ton f he e xit ni ul nd qua e tde i ton r me y u e sa elw.Hu s n v Pal r 468U. 51 5 ( 98 ; e aloPa r tv e d nd r t t a d o . me , S. 7, 33 1 4) s e s r at . T ylr 451U. 5 ( 981 .TheTe a c ur s t m p o d sa a e uaepos- prvai n a o, S. 27 1 ) x s o t yse r vi e n d q t tde i to r m edy f t t ki ofpe s e or he a ng r onalpr t opery.See H olowa v.Wal 78 F. 1 l y ker, 4 2d 287,1 292 ( t Ci.1 6) M oro r t Te ssaea miitai a dj iils tmspr vi 5h r 98 . e ve, he xa tt d nsrtve n udca yse o de adequa e sat pos - prvaton r m edi f pr rt t n f om pr s r See TEX. t t e tde i i e es or ope y ake r i one s. GOV. CODEj5 100 Be a eTe s sa e uaepo tde i to e e is aprs ne do s t 0 . 7. c us xa ha d q t s- prvai nr m d e , io r e no haveabas sf as i 1 cl i f t confs ton ofhi pr ry.M ur y v.Coli i or ecton 983 a m or he i ca i s ope t ph lns, 2 F. 5 ,5 3 ( t Ci.1 4 .Thus pli ifsc amsf rl s o hi pe s na pr p ry 6 3d 41 4 5h r 99 ) , antf li o o s f s ro l o e t m us be di m is f f l et r s a col a e c ai f r i unde s ton 1 t s s ed or aiur o ai e or bl l m or elef r ec i 983. M or eove , ai i fsalegatonsf lt r s a col a ecl m f r ala i a i t r pl ntf l i ai o ai e or bl ai or et i ton ga ns t nam ed def he endant . To s a e a va i cl m f r ala i unde s i 1983,aprs r s tt ld ai or et i ton r ecton ione mu ta lg ( )as ctc c siu i na rgh ,( )t de e a tsi e t r t lae a i t s le e 1 pe i on tt to l i t 2 he f nd n ' ntnt o eait gans s t prs ne f hi e e c s o t trg ,( )ar t la o y a r e a t a ( c us to he io r or s x r ie f ha i ht 3 ea it r dve s c , nd 4) a ai n. Bi b v Ea l 5 1F.d 26 27 ( t Ci. 08 .Ca ai n r q r sas wi g t a t t b s . ry, 4 3 7, 0 5 h r 20 ) us to e uie ho n h t ' bu f t r ala or m otvet com pl ned ofi de ... oul notha occ r ' Johnson or he et i t y i he ai nci nt w d ve ured.' v Ro i e ,11 F.d 29 31 ( t Ci.1 7) Ho ve , a n ifa k wldg d i hi . drgu z 0 3 9, 0 5 h r 99 . we r pli tf c no e e n s se 2 greva r di t aleged r ala i t the di notknow w ho had aut i ed tp i nce egar ng he l et i ton ha d horz orrq se hsj b c n . ( c e Enr No.1 p.1 ) I e d he sae t ta e uetd i o ha ge Do k t ty , 4. nd e , ttd ha n S ni ntfe saf mb r' ha e hij ba sg me ,ndt t edi no kno dheW ho, รป de iid tf me e 'c ng d s o sin nta ha h d t w i u t W ha ,and W hy' behi i. f Cons t ' nd t J. eque l pl ntf hasnotaleged f t s sci t nty, ai i f l ac s uf ent o r s a vi bl cl m f r t i i agai tt nam ed def nda s,and t cl m m us be aie a e ai or e alaton ns he e nt he ai t dim is s s ed. 1 1 Concl i 1. uson Pl ntf cl m sa eD I I ai ifs ai r SM SSED W I PR EJUD I f f l et r seavibl TH CE or aiur o ai a e cl m f whi r i ca begr ed unde s ton 1 ai or ch elef n ant r ec i 983.Any and a lpe ng m otonsa e l ndi i r DENI . ED SGNE aHo so , ea o te F dyo Ma, 0 8 I D t utn T xs n h a f y 2 1. eJcz. KEI P.ELLI TH SON UN I TED STA TES D I STRI J GE CT UD

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.