Connell et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al, No. 4:2015cv02841 - Document 46 (S.D. Tex. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 9/12/16.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Connell et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al Doc. 46 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ROGER CONNELL and RICHARD ASHCROFT On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, VS. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § September 12, 2016 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-15-2841 FINAL JUDGMENT Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the complaint, (Docket Entry No. 35), is granted. In accordance with this court’s Memorandum and Opinion of today’s date, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on September 12, 2016, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
