Fox v. Stephens, No. 4:2013cv01880 - Document 14 (S.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION ON DISMISSAL (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rvazquez)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ROBERT JAMES FOX, § § § § § § § § Petitioner, VS. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:13-CV-1880 OPINION ON DISMISSAL The above-styled action was filed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. However, instead of challenging the fact or duration of his confinement, Petitioner s pleading asserts various civil rights claims.1 Because a favorable judgment on Petitioner=s claims would not necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence, he must present his claims via a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. '1983. Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005) (noting that if a Afavorable determination@ would not automatically entitle the prisoner to an accelerated release, the proper vehicle is a ' 1983 suit). Moreover, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a prisoner cannot file a civil action in forma pauperis in federal court if, on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated, he brought an action that was dismissed for being frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The only exception to this revocation of an inmate s privilege to proceed in forma pauperis is if he is in immediate danger of serious physical harm. Banos v. O Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884 (5th Cir. 1998). Petitioner alleges a number of constitutional violations while stating that the free exercise of religion is the ONLY ISSUE . . . . (Docket No. 1 at 2.) 1 The present suit is clearly subject to the three-strikes bar under Section 1915(g) because Petitioner does not indicate that he is in any danger and his litigation history reveals that he has previously filed numerous frivolous cases in the federal courts. See Fox v. Gardner, No. 3:04cv-2498 (N.D. Tex.) (Docket No. 16, entered March 2, 2005) (noting Fox s designation as a vexatious litigant based on a pattern of frivolous lawsuits ). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this complaint is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) without prejudice to refiling as a civil rights suit with payment of the entire $400.00 filing fee. Any pending motions are further DENIED. The Clerk will provide copies of this Order to Petitioner, the TDCJ-Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Capitol Station, Austin, TX 78711, Fax 512-936-2159, and the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, 211 West Ferguson, Tyler, Texas, 75702, Attention: Three-Strikes List Manager. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 6th day of February, 2014. ___________________________________ MELINDA HARMON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
