McClure et al v. Life Time Fitness, Inc., No. 4:2013cv01794 - Document 16 (S.D. Tex. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER entered: At the August 5, 2013 hearing on the plaintiffs' motion to remand, the court found that Life Time Fitness did not waive its right to removal and that there was no final judgment in the state court case that would bar removal. Th e court did not rule on whether service on Life Time was effective so as to make removal untimely. (Docket Entry No. 15). After the hearing, the plaintiffs supplemented their remand motion. (Docket Entry No. 14). Life Time has until August 30, 20 13 to file a response addressing whether the type of appearance it entered in the state court general or special affected the finality of the state court judgment and the timeliness of removal. The plaintiffs have until September 13, 2013 to file a reply.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.