Barrow v Wells Fargo Bank, NA, No. 4:2013cv01436 - Document 11 (S.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT enteredx. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 1/27/14.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Barrow v Wells Fargo Bank, NA Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ROBERT BARROW, Plaintiff, VS. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1436 FINAL JUDGMENT The defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a motion for summary judgment. No response has been filed. Based on the motion, the accompanying brief and evidence, the pleadings on file, and the relevant authorities, the court issued a Memorandum and Opinion finding that Wells Fargo is entitled to summary judgment. In accordance with the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Opinion, this civil action filed by Robert Barrow is dismissed with prejudice. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on January 27, 2014, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
