Vackar v. Sentry Supply Inc, No. 4:2012cv03716 - Document 57 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered. Based on the courts Memoranda and Opinions issued on July 8, 2013, January 2, 2014, and November 7, 2014, the claims brought by Michael Vackar are dismissed with prejudice, and he takes nothing on those claims; Superior recove rs actual and exemplary damages on its counterclaims for fraud, money had and received, and defamation, in the amounts of $925.24 for actual damages on the fraud and money had and received claims, $1,500 for exemplary damages on the fraud c laim, and $10,800 on the defamation claim; and Superior recovers sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, in the amount of $5,000. Case terminated on 11/7/14(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
Vackar v. Sentry Supply Inc Doc. 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHAEL VACKAR, Plaintiff, VS. SENTRY SUPPLY INC., d/b/a SUPERIOR SUPPLY & STEEL Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-12-3716 FINAL JUDGMENT Based on the court’s Memoranda and Opinions issued on July 8, 2013, January 2, 2014, and November 7, 2014, the claims brought by Michael Vackar are dismissed with prejudice, and he takes nothing on those claims; Superior recovers actual and exemplary damages on its counterclaims for fraud, money had and received, and defamation, in the amounts of $925.24 for actual damages on the fraud and money had and received claims, $1,500 for exemplary damages on the fraud claim, and $10,800 on the defamation claim; and Superior recovers sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, in the amount of $5,000. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on November 7, 2014, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.