Davis v. Toyota Motor Credit et al, No. 4:2012cv00287 - Document 112 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 109 Memorandum and Recommendations, denying 90 MOTION to Stay , denying 98 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, denying 101 Opposed MOTION to Stri ke 98 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, denying 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Breach of the Peace Claim, denying 102 Opposed MOTION for Sanctions, denying 100 Opposed MOTI ON for Entry of Order re: Entry of Final Judgment, denying 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Breach of the Peace Claim, denying 108 Opposed MOTION to Alter Judgment AND Opposed MOTION for Interlocutory Appeal as to 107 Minute Entry Order. Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/9/2014. Docket Call set for 5/16/2014 at 3:30 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)

Download PDF
Davis v. Toyota Motor Credit et al Doc. 112 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VERONICA L. DAVIS, § § Plaintiff, § § § § § § § § § § v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT a/k/a TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES and COUNTRYWIDE ASSET AND AUTO RECOVERY, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-12-0287 ORDER Having reviewed the Magistrate Recommendation dated March 31, thereto, the court 2014, Judge's and is of the opinion that the Memorandum obj ections and filed said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court. It is therefore ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by this court. The Joint Pretrial Order will be filed by May 9, 2014. Docket Call will be held on May 16, 2014, at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 9-B, 9th Floor, United States Courthouse, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002. The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the respective parties. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this 7 SIM LAKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.