Acord et al v. Young Again Products, Inc. et al, No. 4:2011cv03591 - Document 50 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered: Based on the partial summary judgment granted by this court's order dated February 27, 2013, (Docket Entry No. 39), the court's prior rulings, the dismissal of the remaining claims of wrongful execution, conversion, and trespass arising from Young Again Products's seizure of the contents from John Acord's storage unit, the claims pending in Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-35911 are dismissed, with prejudice. The Acords take nothing on their claims. The relief not expressly granted is denied. Case terminated on 3/24/14.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
Acord et al v. Young Again Products, Inc. et al Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JOHN ACORD, et al., Plaintiffs, VS. YOUNG AGAIN PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-3591 FINAL JUDGMENT Based on the partial summary judgment granted by this court’s order dated February 27, 2013, (Docket Entry No. 39), the court’s prior rulings, the dismissal of the remaining claims of wrongful execution, conversion, and trespass arising from Young Again Products’s seizure of the contents from John Acord’s storage unit, the claims pending in Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-35911 are dismissed, with prejudice. The Acords take nothing on their claims. The relief not expressly granted is denied. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on March 24, 2014, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge zz Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.