Vallian v. Astrue et al, No. 4:2010cv01739 - Document 20 (S.D. Tex. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered re: DENYING 16 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment, ADOPTING 19 Memorandum and Recommendations,. Final judgment to be entered by separate order.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vallian v. Astrue et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SHEILA VALLIAN, on behalf of K.E.S., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-1739 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on July 25, 2011 and has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections have been filed. This court finds that the Memorandum and Recommendation should be, and is, adopted as this court’s Memorandum and Order. This court grants the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denies the plaintiff’s motion. This court finds that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision that K.E.S., the plaintiff’s daughter, is not disabled is supported by substantial evidence and was consistent with the applicable law. Final judgment dismissing this suit is entered by separate order. SIGNED on August 17, 2011, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
