Honorable Terry Petteway et al v. Galveston County, Texas et al, No. 3:2022cv00057 - Document 251 (S.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs. Case terminated on 10/13/2023(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Honorable Terry Petteway et al v. Galveston County, Texas et al Doc. 251 Case 3:22-cv-00057 Document 251 Filed on 10/13/23 in TXSD Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION TERRY PETTEWAY, et al., Plaintiffs, VS. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § October 13, 2023 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk 3:22-CV-57 ORDER In its findings of fact and conclusions of law issued today, the court held that the 2021 commissioners-court precinct map adopted by the Galveston County Commissioners Court on November 12, 2021, violates § 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Dkt. 250. The enacted map denies Black and Latino voters the equal opportunity to participate in the political process and the opportunity to elect a representative of their choice to the commissioners court. Accordingly, the court permanently enjoins the defendants from administering, enforcing, preparing for, or in any way permitting the nomination or election of county commissioners from the commissionerscourt precinct map as currently configured. The plaintiffs are the prevailing parties and judgment is hereby entered in their favor. 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:22-cv-00057 Document 251 Filed on 10/13/23 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 Having failed to comply with § 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the commissioners court must adopt another plan in time for the 2024 election, which means before November 11, 2023—the statutory opening date for candidate filing. So the court orders the following remedial proceedings: 1. By October 20, 2023, the defendants shall file with the court a revised redistricting plan with sufficient supporting expert analysis establishing that it complies with § 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Along with these materials, the defendants may include a memorandum of law of no more than 10 pages. 2. By October 27, 2023, the plaintiffs may file objections to the defendants’ revised plan and, if desired, proposed alternative plans with supporting expert analysis. The plaintiffs’ consolidated objections shall be no more than 10 pages. 3. The court will conduct an in-person remedial hearing on November 1, 2023, at 2 p.m. to decide which redistricting plan will be ordered into effect. 4. If the defendants fail or prefer not to submit a revised plan, they are ordered to implement the illustrative plan presented by Anthony Fairfax on August 10, 2023 (PX-339), on or before November 1, 2023, and use that plan for all future elections until the commissioners court adopts a different plan. The court refrains from deciding attorneys’ fees until the plaintiffs seek such relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Signed on Galveston Island this 13th day of October, 2023. __________________________ JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
