Zahorik v. Trott et al, No. 3:2013cv00248 - Document 87 (S.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of all Dfts and against Pltf. ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff TAKE NOTHING from the Tennessee Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Tennessee Defendants are DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdi ction and that the Tennessee Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff. It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff TAKE NOTHING from the Texas Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Texas Defendants are DISMISSED wi th prejudice to being reasserted until the conditions of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met and that the Texas Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff....***Case terminated on 4/15/14(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Zahorik v. Trott et al Doc. 87 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION VINCENT ZAHORIK V. TRACY TROTT, ET AL. § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. G-13-248 FINAL JUDGMENT Today the Court granted the “Motion to Dismiss” of Defendants, Colonel Tracy Trott, Captain Victor Donoho, Captain Mark Sanford, Lieutenant Dan Moore, Lieutenant Mike Hamilton, Sergeant Ron Meyer, Trooper Bradley Aktinson, Henderson County Circuit Court Clerk Beverly Dunaway, Assistant District Attorney for the 26th Judicial District of Tennessee Angela Scott, and District Attorney General for the 26th Judicial District of Tennessee James G. Woodall (collectively, the “Tennessee Defendants”) and the “Motion to Dismiss” of Defendants, Jeremy Kylen, Mark Pilsner, Gilbert Gomez, Henry Porretto and the City of Galveston, Texas (collectively, the “Texas Defendants”) and dismissed the complaint of Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik. It is, therefore, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik, TAKE NOTHING from the Tennessee Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik, against the Tennessee Defendants are DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdiction and that the Tennessee Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik, TAKE NOTHING from the Texas Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik, against the Texas Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice to being reasserted until the conditions of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met and that the Texas Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik. THIS IS A FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT. DONE at Galveston, Texas, this 15th 2 day of April, 2014.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
