Flores v. Bodden, No. 3:2007cv00088 - Document 54 (S.D. Tex. 2008)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Evidentiary Hearing set for 9/12/2008 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner in Galveston, TX re: 50 Motion to Vacate Order Awarding Attorney's Fees.(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Flores v. Bodden Doc. 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ABRAHAM FLORES VS. LORANCE W. BODDEN PATRICIO ZAMORA VS. LORANCE W. BODDEN § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. G-07-088 § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. G-07-090 OPINION AND ORDER On July 28, 2008, this Court held a Hearing on the Defendant’s “Motion to Vacate Order Awarding Attorney’s fees or in the alternative, Motion for Rehearing” filed in each of the abovestyled causes. Counsel for Plaintiffs appeared in person. Counsel for Defendant, Lorance W. Bodden, also appeared in person. Counsel for the Stratton Law Firm did not appear to defend its interest in the Order awarding the Firm fees and expenses. The Court, having heard arguments from the attorneys present now issues this Opinion and Order. The Court finds that Gilberto Hinojosa, counsel for Defendant, did not receive adequate actual notice of the application for fees and expenses in time to permit a formal response to be timely filed and that his failure to do is, under the circumstances of this case, excusable. The Court further finds that Hinojosa has raised reasonable questions regarding the propriety of the $43,827.91 award of fees and expenses to the Stratton Law Firm. The Court, therefore, concludes Dockets.Justia.com that the Defendant should be entitled to challenge those fees and expenses even though they were paid to avoid contempt of the District Court’s Order. It is, therefore, ORDERED that this Court WILL conduct an Evidentiary Hearing on September 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., in Galveston, Texas, on the issue of the amount of attorney’s fees and expenses associated with obtaining the Default Judgments; preparing for and attending the Damages Hearings, if any; for pursuing collection efforts; and for responding to the Motion to Vacate to which the Stratton Law Firm is entitled. DONE at Brownsville, Texas, this 13th 2 day of August, 2008.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
