Perez v. Rupert, No. 2:2015cv00352 - Document 8 (S.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL denying 7 Motion to Appoint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Perez v. Rupert Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ROBERTO PEREZ JR., Petitioner, VS. JOHN A RUPERT, Respondent. § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-352 § § § § OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Petitioner filed this § 2254 petition on August 17, 2015, challenging his Nueces County conviction for manslaughter (D.E. 1). Pending is his motion for appointment of counsel (D.E. 7). There is no constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings. Johnson v. Hargett, 978 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1992). Rule 8 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires that counsel be appointed if the habeas petition raises issues which mandate an evidentiary hearing. The filing fee has not been paid and service of process has not been ordered. At this point there are no issues which mandate an evidentiary hearing. An evidentiary hearing will be scheduled and counsel will be assigned sua sponte if there are issues which mandate a hearing. Moreover, counsel may be assigned if discovery is ordered and issues necessitating the assignment of counsel are evident. Rule 6(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Thomas v. Scott, 47 F.3d 713, 715 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1995). 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (D.E. 7) is denied without prejudice. ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2015. ___________________________________ B. JANICE ELLINGTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2/2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
