Meza v. Paxton et al, No. 2:2015cv00322 - Document 23 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

Court Description: Opinion and Order Denying Petitioner's Motion for Entry of Default 22 Motion for Entry of Default.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amireles, 2)

Download PDF
Meza v. Paxton et al Doc. 23 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ROLANDO ROMERO MEZA, Petitioner, VS. KEN PAXTON, et al, Respondents. December 11, 2015 David J. Bradley, Clerk § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-322 § § § § OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT Pending is Petitioner's motion for entry of default in this habeas action (D.E. 22). When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend a lawsuit in federal court and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party’s default. FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a). Although no Fifth Circuit precedent was located, several circuits have held that the entry of default in habeas corpus proceedings is inappropriate. Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134 (6th Cir. 1970); Stines v. Martin, 849 F.2d 1323 (10th Cir. 1988); Aziz v. Leferve, 830 F.2d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1987); United States ex rel Mattox v. Scott, 507 F.2d 919 (7th Cir. 1974); Bermudez v. Reid, 733 F.2d 18 (2d Cir. 1984). Generally, these circuit courts have required the district courts to review the merits, and to grant relief only if the court finds evidence to establish a claim of unlawful detention. Stines, 849 F.2d at 1324. An exception to the general rule would be where the Government’s delay itself rises to the level of a due process violation. Id. at 1324 (citing Ruiz v. Cady, 660 F.2d 337, 341 n. 5 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com (7th Cir. 1981)). Minor delays do not give rise to a due process violation. Stines, 849 F.2d at 1324. In any event, Respondent is not in default. Respondent requested and was given an extension of time, until December 13, 2015, to file a responsive pleading. Petitioner’s Motion for entry of default (D.E. 22) is denied. ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2015. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.