Schneider v. Kaelin et al, No. 2:2012cv00233 - Document 37 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION granting 34 Motion for a Jury Trial.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION EDWIN GUS SCHNEIDER #867105 v. JIM KAELIN, ET AL. § § § § § C.A. NO. C-12-233 OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR A JURY TRIAL Plaintiff is an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, and is currently incarcerated at the Coffield Unit in Tennessee Colony, Texas. Proceeding pro se, he filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (D.E. 1). Pending is his motion for a jury trial. (D.E. 34). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure note that [t]he right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution or as provided by a federal statute is preserved to the parties inviolate. Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(a); see also U.S. Const. amend. VII. Plaintiff has adequately made a jury demand in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b). For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff s motion for a jury trial, (D.E. 34), is GRANTED. ORDERED this 30th day of November 2012. ____________________________________ BRIAN L. OWSLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.