Brito v. United States of America, No. 2:2010cv00150 - Document 5 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION RAMON JAIMES BRITO Petitioner VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. C-10-150 OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Petitioner is incarcerated at the FCI Sheridan in Sheridan Oregon. In this petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, he challenges his Corpus Christi Division drug conviction1 pursuant to the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) (D.E. 1). A petition pursuant to § 2241 must be filed in the district of incarceration, where the District Court has jurisdiction over the prisoner and his custodian. Lee v. Wetzel, 244 F.3d 370, 373 (5th Cir. 2001). This is true even where the petition contests the legality of a sentence under the savings clause. Id. at 374. The district of sentencing does not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of a § 2241 petition unless the petitioner or his custodian is located there. Id.. Accordingly, this § 2241 petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to petitioner s right to file it in the appropriate court. SIGNED and ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2010. ___________________________________ Janis Graham Jack United States District Judge 1 Petitioner was convicted in the Corpus Christi Division of the Southern District of Texas of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, and was sentenced to serve a term of 324 months BOP custody to be followed by five years of supervised release and $100 special assessment. See United States v. Ramon Jaimes Brito, Cause No. 2:07cr398-01, D.E. 204. His § 2255 motion was denied November 20, 2009. See id, D.E. 273. 1/1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.