Humphrey v. Director TDCJ - CID, No. 7:2017cv00097 - Document 9 (N.D. Tex. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. re: 8 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brison Keith Humphrey. For the foregoing reasons, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/12/2017) (trt)

Download PDF
Humphrey v. Director TDCJ - CID Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION BRISON KEITH HUMPHREY, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:17-CV-097-O ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court. Review of the petition reveals that the incidents underlying Petitioner’s habeas claims occurred in March 2017. See Petition, ECF No. 2 at 15-27. Therefore, he has ample time in which to re-file his habeas petition if he so desires. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (a one-year statute of limitations applies to § 2254 habeas petitions). For the foregoing reasons, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. SO ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2017. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.