Morris v. Bria et al, No. 7:2017cv00034 - Document 78 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 75 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 57 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Todrick Morris. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion (ECF No. 57) for the Court to order Allred Unit officials to return his legal materials is DENIED as MOOT. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/20/2017) (trt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Morris v. Bria et al Doc. 78 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION TODRICK MORRIS, TDCJ No. 854732, Plaintiff, v. LT. ANTHONY BRIA, et al., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00034-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 57) for the Court to order Allred Unit officials to return his legal materials is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED on this 20th day of November, 2017. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
