Kirkland et al v. Tri-C Wood Products, Inc, No. 7:2016cv00062 - Document 16 (N.D. Tex. 2016)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 15 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 6 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Kristin Kirkland, Stephen Kirkland. The Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation o f the United States Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as the findings of the Court. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the 97th Judicial District Court of Montague County, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 8/16/2016) (plp)

Download PDF
Kirkland et al v. Tri-C Wood Products, Inc Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION STEPHEN KIRKLAND and KRISTIN KIRKLAND, Plaintiffs, v. TRI-C WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants, v. V&B INTERNTIONAL, INC., Third-Party Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00062-O ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 25. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation de novo since a motion to remand is a dispositive matter. Davidson v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC, 819 F.3d 758, 765 (5th Cir. April 19, 2016). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as the findings of the Court. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the 97th Judicial District Court of Montague County, Texas. The clerk shall mail a certified copy of this order to the clerk of Montague, Texas. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED on this 16th day of August, 2016. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.