Gilbert v. Price, No. 7:2014cv00018 - Document 15 (N.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 14 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. Accordingly, Defendant Judge Mark Prices Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Gilberts Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED in part, and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A final judgment will issue separately. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/3/2014) (trt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gilbert v. Price Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION JERRY M. GILBERT, SR., Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MARK PRICE, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:14-cv0018-O ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case on August 18, 2014. ECF No. 14. No objections were filed. The district court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendant Judge Mark Price’s Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Gilbert’s Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED in part, and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A final judgment will issue separately. SO ORDERED on this 3rd day of September, 2014. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
