Williams v. Director TDCJ-CID, No. 7:2013cv00030 - Document 49 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 45 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Curtis Leo Williams. Accordingly, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 6/3/2015) (trt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Director TDCJ-CID Doc. 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION CURTIS LEO WILLIAMS, TDCJ No. 1649233, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil No. 7:13-CV-030-O-KA ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of the objections thereto filed by Petitioner and by Respondent, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court. Accordingly, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2015. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
